What was the difficulty/test
mentioned in the "change of qiblah" verses?
It has recently come to my attention that many people misread
these verses and erroneously conclude that the difficulty
discussed in 2:143 was the change in "qiblah" (which is what
Traditional explanations tend to focus on). In some ways it is
understandable that a misreading occurs as we are likely clouded
in thinking by the traditional discussions surrounding these
verses. I will outline the multiple problems with this traditional
understanding:
1) Please pay careful attention to the tense of the words
highlighted (
green is
present/future/imperfect tense,
red
is past/perfect tense):
2:142 The foolish from the people will say* "What has turned them from
the qiblah/focal-point which
they were on it**?"
Say: "To God is the east and the west, He guides
whomever He wishes to a straight/establishing path."
2:143 And as such We have
made you a balanced community so that you will be witnesses
over the people, and the messenger will be a witness over
you. And not We made the qiblah/focal-point which thou were on it** except that We make
evident he who follows the messenger from he who will turn
back on his heels. And indeed it was certainly a
great/difficult (thing/test) except for
those whom God guided;
And not was God to let
go waste your belief. Indeed, God is over the people
Fully-Kind and Merciful.
2:144 Indeed, We see thy face/consideration
moving in the sky/heaven; so surely
We will turn thee (onto/to) a qiblah/focal-point that
will please thee: so turn...
*i.e. they will say in the
future, obviously AFTER the change in qiblah/focus
occurs. This is also made clear by use of the prefixed future
particle "sa" in the Arabic.
**compare these occurrences.
Hopefully it should now be clear that the
great/big (thing/test) was being on the 1st
qiblah (i.e.
the one prior to the change). However, we can also verify this
using what else The Quran says.
2) It is clear from 2:144 that the change in
qiblah (or
the 2nd
qiblah) will please the messenger. Therefore if
you think that the change in
qiblah was the difficult
thing (as is traditionally discussed) then this will conflict with
the messenger being pleased about it. Is he pleased for him (and
his community) to undergo a great difficulty? Yes/No.
3) If, for some reason, you answer "yes" to the above it is
refuted by 2:144 when it says "
Indeed, We see thy face/consideration
moving in the sky/heaven; so surely
We will turn thee (onto/to) a qiblah/focal-point that
will please thee...".
This is taken by everyone (that I have read) to mean the messenger
was seeking guidance, he was somewhat unsettled/uncomfortable, and
we may even say not as pleased (relatively speaking) on the 1st
qiblah (prior to the change). To make it even clearer:
We see thy face/consideration
moving in the sky/heaven (i.e. currently on the 1st qiblah,
less pleasing)
so
surely We will
turn thee (onto/to) a qiblah/focal-point that
will please thee (i.e. on/to the 2nd qiblah,
more pleasing)
This matches with 2:143 in which it is said the 1st/prior
qiblah
was difficult. It ties together perfectly.
4) Furthermore, this is confirmed in 2:150 when it gives us
the reasons for the change (or what the change in
qiblah will
result in) e.g. "
so
that not will be for the people against you debate/argument".
Obviously being in a situation of less argument/hostility would be
more pleasing i.e. a positive, further solidifying that the 1st
qiblah which they were on (probably involving more
argument/hostility) was the difficult one.
All information confirms and reinforces each other, that being on
the 1st
qiblah was the difficulty spoken of in 2:143.
Note: I am simply using the terminology "1st
qiblah" and
"2nd
qiblah" to make this article easier to follow. In
the
article
on "al masjid al haram" it is highlighted that The Quran
tells us there could be many
qiblah, each person could
have their own
qiblah etc. This makes sense with the term
qiblah being related to
wijhatun (course, goal,
motive, direction) in 2:148. To read further discussion please see
the
article.
After reading these articles you may wish to try slotting in
whatever understanding you have of "
qiblah" and "
al
masjid al haram" and what the 1st
qiblah was etc to
see if you can make sense of the verses. There is a high chance
you will fail and/or be unable to explain the various issues
brought up in these verses. If you come up with something that
fits (different to my own understanding) please
share
it here.
It is ironic to think that some may read the above, ignore the
problems and stick with their current view. Akin to turning back
on their heels unable to face the truth. Maybe it's time to change
direction?
Article on the
problems
of qiblah as prayer direction.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
This work reflects my personal
understanding, as of 17th July 2020. Seeking knowledge is a
continual process and I will try to improve my understanding
of the signs within 'the reading' (al quran) and out with it, unless The God
wills otherwise. All information is correct
to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be
taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and
verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.
More
articles: http://mypercept.co.uk/articles/